[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14616633#comment-14616633
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-12295:
-----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12743926/HBASE-12295_10.patch
  against master branch at commit 7acb061e63614ad957da654f920f54ac7a02edd6.
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12743926

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 41 new 
or modified tests.

    {color:green}+1 hadoop versions{color}. The patch compiles with all 
supported hadoop versions (2.4.0 2.4.1 2.5.0 2.5.1 2.5.2 2.6.0 2.7.0)

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 protoc{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of protoc compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool did not generate any 
warning messages.

                {color:red}-1 checkstyle{color}.  The applied patch generated 
1908 checkstyle errors (more than the master's current 1898 errors).

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any  new 
Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:red}-1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch introduces the following lines 
longer than 100:
    +          ret = new 
SharedMemorySizeCachedNoTagsKeyValue(blockBuffer.array(), 
blockBuffer.arrayOffset()
+    // those cells are referring to a shared memory area which if evicted by 
the BucketCache would lead
+    // readers using this block are aware of this fact and do the necessary 
action to prevent eviction
+    // An RpcCallBack that creates a list of scanners that needs to perform 
callBack operation on completion of multiGets
+        return Result.create(results, get.isCheckExistenceOnly() ? 
!results.isEmpty() : null, stale);
+      // HBaseAdmin only waits for regions to appear in hbase:meta we should 
wait until they are assigned
+  public void testGetsWithMultiColumnsAndExplicitTracker() throws IOException, 
InterruptedException {
+    private void slowdownCode(final 
ObserverContext<RegionCoprocessorEnvironment> e, boolean isGet) {
+        // call return twice because for the isCache cased the counter would 
have got incremented twice

  {color:green}+1 site{color}.  The mvn post-site goal succeeds with this patch.

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in .

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/14690//testReport/
Release Findbugs (version 2.0.3)        warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/14690//artifact/patchprocess/newFindbugsWarnings.html
Checkstyle Errors: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/14690//artifact/patchprocess/checkstyle-aggregate.html

                Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/14690//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Prevent block eviction under us if reads are in progress from the BBs
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-12295
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12295
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: regionserver, Scanners
>            Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>            Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-12295.pdf, HBASE-12295_1.patch, HBASE-12295_1.pdf, 
> HBASE-12295_10.patch, HBASE-12295_2.patch, HBASE-12295_4.patch, 
> HBASE-12295_4.pdf, HBASE-12295_5.pdf, HBASE-12295_9.patch, 
> HBASE-12295_trunk.patch
>
>
> While we try to serve the reads from the BBs directly from the block cache, 
> we need to ensure that the blocks does not get evicted under us while 
> reading.  This JIRA is to discuss and implement a strategy for the same.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to