[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14639735#comment-14639735
]
Enis Soztutar commented on HBASE-14070:
---------------------------------------
bq. What about replication? Are we trying to order events between clusters? I
assume we won't: On the sink we just apply edits at the timestamps at which
they happened, which may be in the past. So I think replication does not need
special consideration.
Sorry I missed this. For replication, the timestamps from cells should just
update the Clock of the node. In that case, there is no special handling. Since
we always carry the PT+LT components in the timestamps with cells, it is just a
matter of doing a receive event per cell in writes from replication.
> Hybrid Logical Clocks for HBase
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-14070
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14070
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Enis Soztutar
> Assignee: Enis Soztutar
> Attachments: HybridLogicalClocksforHBaseandPhoenix.docx,
> HybridLogicalClocksforHBaseandPhoenix.pdf
>
>
> HBase and Phoenix uses systems physical clock (PT) to give timestamps to
> events (read and writes). This works mostly when the system clock is strictly
> monotonically increasing and there is no cross-dependency between servers
> clocks. However we know that leap seconds, general clock skew and clock drift
> are in fact real.
> This jira proposes using Hybrid Logical Clocks (HLC) as an implementation of
> hybrid physical clock + a logical clock. HLC is best of both worlds where it
> keeps causality relationship similar to logical clocks, but still is
> compatible with NTP based physical system clock. HLC can be represented in
> 64bits.
> A design document is attached and also can be found here:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LL2GAodiYi0waBz5ODGL4LDT4e_bXy8P9h6kWC05Bhw/edit#
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
