[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14063?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642559#comment-14642559
]
stack commented on HBASE-14063:
-------------------------------
Should ByteBufferedKeyOnlyKeyValue be called ByteBufferedKey? Or ByteBufferKey.
The former is a mouthful. Could be done in a followup issue.
Is this for serialization only?
40 public ByteBufferedKeyOnlyKeyValue() {
41 }
Add a comment if so on commit.
Why we have to have a OffheapKeyValue? What makes it different from a KV other
than the assert that it is backed by direct bytebuffer?
This is threadsafe? Won't have two threads concurrently trying to do this?
bufBackedKeyOnlyKv.setKey(pair.getFirst(), pair.getSecond(),
klen);
> Use BufferBackedCell in read path after HBASE-12213 and HBASE-12295
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-14063
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14063
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: regionserver, Scanners
> Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-14063.patch, HBASE-14063_1.patch,
> HBASE-14063_3.patch, HBASE-14063_final.patch
>
>
> Subtask to ensure that the BytebufferBackedCell gets used in the read path
> after HBASE-12213 and HBASE-12295 goes in. This would help to clearly change
> the required places and makes the review easier.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
