[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14696422#comment-14696422
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-10844:
-----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12750403/HBASE-10844.02-0.98.patch
  against 0.98 branch at commit 4dd30ab019cfbf3691fd08f7941d33d8bbc37f05.
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12750403

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:red}-1 tests included{color}.  The patch doesn't appear to include 
any new or modified tests.
                        Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
                        Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

    {color:green}+1 hadoop versions{color}. The patch compiles with all 
supported hadoop versions (2.4.0 2.4.1 2.5.0 2.5.1 2.5.2 2.6.0 2.7.0)

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 protoc{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of protoc compiler warnings.

    {color:red}-1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool appears to have generated 
23 warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 checkstyle{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of checkstyle errors

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any  new 
Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch does not introduce lines 
longer than 100

    {color:red}-1 site{color}.  The patch appears to cause mvn post-site goal 
to fail.

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in .

     {color:red}-1 core zombie tests{color}.  There are 1 zombie test(s):       
at org.apache.oozie.test.MiniHCatServer$1.run(MiniHCatServer.java:137)
        at 
org.apache.oozie.test.XTestCase$MiniClusterShutdownMonitor.run(XTestCase.java:1071)

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/15092//testReport/
Release Findbugs (version 2.0.3)        warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/15092//artifact/patchprocess/newFindbugsWarnings.html
Checkstyle Errors: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/15092//artifact/patchprocess/checkstyle-aggregate.html

  Javadoc warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/15092//artifact/patchprocess/patchJavadocWarnings.txt
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/15092//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Coprocessor failure during batchmutation leaves the memstore datastructs in 
> an inconsistent state
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-10844
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10844
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: regionserver
>            Reporter: Devaraj Das
>            Assignee: Devaraj Das
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 0.98.14, 1.0.2, 1.2.0, 1.3.0, 1.1.3
>
>         Attachments: 10844-1-0.98.txt, 10844-1.txt, 10844-v2.patch, 
> HBASE-10844.02-0.98.patch, HBASE-10844.02-branch-1.0.patch, 
> HBASE-10844.02.patch
>
>
> Observed this in the testing with Phoenix. The test in Phoenix - 
> MutableIndexFailureIT deliberately fails the batchmutation call via the 
> installed coprocessor. But the update is not rolled back. That leaves the 
> memstore inconsistent. In particular, I observed that getFlushableSize is 
> updated before the coprocessor was called but the update is not rolled back. 
> When the region is being closed at some later point, the assert introduced in 
> HBASE-10514 in the HRegion.doClose() causes the RegionServer to shutdown 
> abnormally.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to