[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14699179#comment-14699179
 ] 

Francis Liu commented on HBASE-6721:
------------------------------------

{quote}
I ran the binary compatibility checker tool comparing hbase-6721-0.98 with 
0.98.13. The tool says hbase-6721-0.98 is 100% binary compatible with 0.98.13, 
with some source level incompatibility of mild concern in the MasterObserver 
interface. 
{quote}
This is prolly because of the new methods this patch adds to the interface. 
This shouldn't be a concern then?

{quote}
Do we need GroupAdmin and GroupAdminClient now? A hold over from an initial 
coprocessor based implementation?
{quote}
This was based on review comments from [~enis] tho I'm not sure if the comment 
still stands post-cp implementation. I am fine either way. Should this be in 
HBaseAdmin then?

https://reviews.apache.org/r/27673/diff/2?file=751817#file751817line52
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27673/diff/2?file=751816#file751816line35



> RegionServer Group based Assignment
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-6721
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6721
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Francis Liu
>            Assignee: Francis Liu
>              Labels: hbase-6721
>         Attachments: 6721-master-webUI.patch, HBASE-6721 
> GroupBasedLoadBalancer Sequence Diagram.xml, HBASE-6721-DesigDoc.pdf, 
> HBASE-6721-DesigDoc.pdf, HBASE-6721-DesigDoc.pdf, HBASE-6721-DesigDoc.pdf, 
> HBASE-6721_0.98_2.patch, HBASE-6721_10.patch, HBASE-6721_11.patch, 
> HBASE-6721_8.patch, HBASE-6721_9.patch, HBASE-6721_9.patch, 
> HBASE-6721_94.patch, HBASE-6721_94.patch, HBASE-6721_94_2.patch, 
> HBASE-6721_94_3.patch, HBASE-6721_94_3.patch, HBASE-6721_94_4.patch, 
> HBASE-6721_94_5.patch, HBASE-6721_94_6.patch, HBASE-6721_94_7.patch, 
> HBASE-6721_98_1.patch, HBASE-6721_98_2.patch, HBASE-6721_trunk.patch, 
> HBASE-6721_trunk.patch, HBASE-6721_trunk.patch, HBASE-6721_trunk1.patch, 
> HBASE-6721_trunk2.patch, balanceCluster Sequence Diagram.svg, 
> immediateAssignments Sequence Diagram.svg, randomAssignment Sequence 
> Diagram.svg, retainAssignment Sequence Diagram.svg, roundRobinAssignment 
> Sequence Diagram.svg
>
>
> In multi-tenant deployments of HBase, it is likely that a RegionServer will 
> be serving out regions from a number of different tables owned by various 
> client applications. Being able to group a subset of running RegionServers 
> and assign specific tables to it, provides a client application a level of 
> isolation and resource allocation.
> The proposal essentially is to have an AssignmentManager which is aware of 
> RegionServer groups and assigns tables to region servers based on groupings. 
> Load balancing will occur on a per group basis as well. 
> This is essentially a simplification of the approach taken in HBASE-4120. See 
> attached document.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to