[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13132355#comment-13132355
 ] 

jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on HBASE-4485:
------------------------------------------------------


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/2481/#review2736
-----------------------------------------------------------


Looks good to me. Would be awesome to get this finally out of the way!
A few nits (like trailing spaces). And some questions below.


src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/MemStore.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/2481/#comment6164>

    Can this now be a static inner class (if we pass kvSet, etc) to the 
MemstoreScanner constructor?



src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/MemStore.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/2481/#comment6166>

    Can these be private?
    volatile because you did not want synchronous in the MemstoreScanner 
constructor?



src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/MemStore.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/2481/#comment6162>

    Cool.
    
    Only concern is that while the scanner exists we may need more memory than 
before.



src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/Store.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/2481/#comment6160>

    Why can you move this up?



src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/StoreScanner.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/2481/#comment6159>

    I'm not usually a fan of instanceof - unless necessary of course.
    Why did you need to fold this into one loop?


- Lars


On 2011-10-20 19:13:56, Amitanand Aiyer wrote:
bq.  
bq.  -----------------------------------------------------------
bq.  This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
bq.  https://reviews.apache.org/r/2481/
bq.  -----------------------------------------------------------
bq.  
bq.  (Updated 2011-10-20 19:13:56)
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  Review request for Ted Yu, Michael Stack, Jonathan Gray, Lars Hofhansl, 
Amitanand Aiyer, Kannan Muthukkaruppan, Karthik Ranganathan, and Nicolas 
Spiegelberg.
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  Summary
bq.  -------
bq.  
bq.  Part of the 2856 diff split into 3 parts for easier review
bq.  
bq.  The first part is v6 of the patch submitted to:
bq.  https://reviews.apache.org/r/2224/
bq.  
bq.  This is the fix for HBase-4485
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  This addresses bug hbase-4485.
bq.      https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/hbase-4485
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  Diffs
bq.  -----
bq.  
bq.    src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/Store.java 7761c42 
bq.    src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/StoreScanner.java 
f5b5c4c 
bq.    src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/MemStore.java 34263e4 
bq.  
bq.  Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/2481/diff
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  Testing
bq.  -------
bq.  
bq.  running mvn test with all 3 patches together.
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  Thanks,
bq.  
bq.  Amitanand
bq.  
bq.


                
> Eliminate window of missing Data
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-4485
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4485
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Amitanand Aiyer
>            Assignee: Amitanand Aiyer
>             Fix For: 0.94.0
>
>         Attachments: 4485-v1.diff, 4485-v2.diff, 4485-v3.diff, 4485-v4.diff, 
> repro_bug-4485.diff
>
>
> After incorporating v11 of the 2856 fix, we discovered that we are still 
> having some ACID violations.
> This time, however, the problem is not about including "newer" updates; but, 
> about missing older updates
> that should be including. 
> Here is what seems to be happening.
> There is a race condition in the StoreScanner.getScanners()
>   private List<KeyValueScanner> getScanners(Scan scan,
>       final NavigableSet<byte[]> columns) throws IOException {
>     // First the store file scanners
>     List<StoreFileScanner> sfScanners = StoreFileScanner
>       .getScannersForStoreFiles(store.getStorefiles(), cacheBlocks,
>                                 isGet, false);
>     List<KeyValueScanner> scanners =
>       new ArrayList<KeyValueScanner>(sfScanners.size()+1);
>     // include only those scan files which pass all filters
>     for (StoreFileScanner sfs : sfScanners) {
>       if (sfs.shouldSeek(scan, columns)) {
>         scanners.add(sfs);
>       }
>     }
>     // Then the memstore scanners
>     if (this.store.memstore.shouldSeek(scan)) {
>       scanners.addAll(this.store.memstore.getScanners());
>     }
>     return scanners;
>   }
> If for example there is a call to Store.updateStorefiles() that happens 
> between
> the store.getStorefiles() and this.store.memstore.getScanners(); then
> it is possible that there was a new HFile created, that is not seen by the
> StoreScanner, and the data is not present in the Memstore.snapshot either.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to