[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14715647#comment-14715647 ]
Ted Yu commented on HBASE-14268: -------------------------------- Please add javadoc for the following: {code} + public interface ObjectFactory<K, V> { {code} How were these default values chosen ? {code} + * Creates a new pool with the default initial capacity (16) + * and the default concurrency level (16). {code} Some tests don't have timeout parameter: {code} + @Test + public void testKeys() { {code} Please add timeout parameter. > Improve KeyLocker > ----------------- > > Key: HBASE-14268 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14268 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Hiroshi Ikeda > Assignee: Hiroshi Ikeda > Priority: Minor > Attachments: 14268-V5.patch, HBASE-14268-V2.patch, > HBASE-14268-V3.patch, HBASE-14268-V4.patch, HBASE-14268-V5.patch, > HBASE-14268-V5.patch, HBASE-14268.patch, KeyLockerPerformance.java > > > 1. In the implementation of {{KeyLocker}} it uses atomic variables inside a > synchronized block, which doesn't make sense. Moreover, logic inside the > synchronized block is not trivial so that it makes less performance in heavy > multi-threaded environment. > 2. {{KeyLocker}} gives an instance of {{RentrantLock}} which is already > locked, but it doesn't follow the contract of {{ReentrantLock}} because you > are not allowed to freely invoke lock/unlock methods under that contract. > That introduces a potential risk; Whenever you see a variable of the type > {{RentrantLock}}, you should pay attention to what the included instance is > coming from. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)