[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13133599#comment-13133599
]
Ted Yu commented on HBASE-4532:
-------------------------------
TestHCM wasn't fixed. If the test fails consistently, maybe you can help debug
it.
For the other test failures, it seems ulimit on the machine performing tests
has to
be increased.
> Avoid top row seek by dedicated bloom filter for delete family bloom filter
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-4532
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4532
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Liyin Tang
> Assignee: Liyin Tang
> Attachments: D27.1.patch, D27.1.patch, HBASE-4532-apache-trunk.patch,
> hbase-4532-89-fb.patch
>
>
> The previous jira, HBASE-4469, is to avoid the top row seek operation if
> row-col bloom filter is enabled.
> This jira tries to avoid top row seek for all the cases by creating a
> dedicated bloom filter only for delete family
> The only subtle use case is when we are interested in the top row with empty
> column.
> For example,
> we are interested in row1/cf1:/1/put.
> So we seek to the top row: row1/cf1:/MAX_TS/MAXIMUM. And the delete family
> bloom filter will say there is NO delete family.
> Then it will avoid the top row seek and return a fake kv, which is the last
> kv for this row (createLastOnRowCol).
> In this way, we have already missed the real kv we are interested in.
> The solution for the above problem is to disable this optimization if we are
> trying to GET/SCAN a row with empty column.
> Evaluation from TestSeekOptimization:
> Previously:
> For bloom=NONE, compr=NONE total seeks without optimization: 2506, with
> optimization: 1714 (68.40%), savings: 31.60%
> For bloom=ROW, compr=NONE total seeks without optimization: 2506, with
> optimization: 1714 (68.40%), savings: 31.60%
> For bloom=ROWCOL, compr=NONE total seeks without optimization: 2506, with
> optimization: 1458 (58.18%), savings: 41.82%
> For bloom=NONE, compr=GZ total seeks without optimization: 2506, with
> optimization: 1714 (68.40%), savings: 31.60%
> For bloom=ROW, compr=GZ total seeks without optimization: 2506, with
> optimization: 1714 (68.40%), savings: 31.60%
> For bloom=ROWCOL, compr=GZ total seeks without optimization: 2506, with
> optimization: 1458 (58.18%), savings: 41.82%
> So we can get about 10% more seek savings ONLY if the ROWCOL bloom filter is
> enabled.[HBASE-4469]
> ================================================
> After this change:
> For bloom=NONE, compr=NONE total seeks without optimization: 2506, with
> optimization: 1458 (58.18%), savings: 41.82%
> For bloom=ROW, compr=NONE total seeks without optimization: 2506, with
> optimization: 1458 (58.18%), savings: 41.82%
> For bloom=ROWCOL, compr=NONE total seeks without optimization: 2506, with
> optimization: 1458 (58.18%), savings: 41.82%
> For bloom=NONE, compr=GZ total seeks without optimization: 2506, with
> optimization: 1458 (58.18%), savings: 41.82%
> For bloom=ROW, compr=GZ total seeks without optimization: 2506, with
> optimization: 1458 (58.18%), savings: 41.82%
> For bloom=ROWCOL, compr=GZ total seeks without optimization: 2506, with
> optimization: 1458 (58.18%), savings: 41.82%
> So we can get about 10% more seek savings for ALL kinds of bloom filter.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
