[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14735137#comment-14735137
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-13984:
-----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12754630/HBASE-13984-V2.diff
  against master branch at commit e95358a7fc3f554dcbb351c8b7295cafc01e8c23.
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12754630

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 3 new 
or modified tests.

    {color:green}+1 hadoop versions{color}. The patch compiles with all 
supported hadoop versions (2.4.0 2.4.1 2.5.0 2.5.1 2.5.2 2.6.0 2.7.0 2.7.1)

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 protoc{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of protoc compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool did not generate any 
warning messages.

                {color:red}-1 checkstyle{color}.  The applied patch generated 
1837 checkstyle errors (more than the master's current 1834 errors).

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any  new 
Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:red}-1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch introduces the following lines 
longer than 100:
    +      if (allowHeartbeatResults && callable.isHeartbeatMessage() && 
callable.getNextCell() != null) {
+     * This cell is not necessarily belongs to the valid scan results, i.e. it 
can be a delete marker
+     * This cell is not necessarily belongs to the valid scan results, i.e. it 
can be a delete marker
+     * This cell is not necessarily belongs to the valid scan results, i.e. it 
can be a delete marker
+     * This cell is not necessarily belongs to the valid scan results, i.e. it 
can be a delete marker
+     * This cell is not necessarily belongs to the valid scan results, i.e. it 
can be a delete marker
+     * This cell is not necessarily belongs to the valid scan results, i.e. it 
can be a delete marker
+       * This field is filled with the next cell (the first cell of the next 
row) of the scanner when
+       * server send heartbeat message after timeout. The cell can be used as 
start row of a new scan.
+       * This cell is not necessarily belongs to the valid scan results, i.e. 
it can be a delete marker

    {color:red}-1 site{color}.  The patch appears to cause mvn post-site goal 
to fail.

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in .

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/15461//testReport/
Release Findbugs (version 2.0.3)        warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/15461//artifact/patchprocess/newFindbugsWarnings.html
Checkstyle Errors: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/15461//artifact/patchprocess/checkstyle-aggregate.html

                Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/15461//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Add option to allow caller to know the heartbeat and scanner position when 
> scanner timeout
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-13984
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13984
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Scanners
>            Reporter: He Liangliang
>            Assignee: He Liangliang
>         Attachments: HBASE-13984-V1.diff, HBASE-13984-V2.diff
>
>
> HBASE-13090 introduced scanner heartbeat. However, there are still some 
> limitations (see HBASE-13215). In some application, for example, an operation 
> access hbase to scan table data, and there is strict limit that this call 
> must return in a fixed interval. At the same time, this call is stateless, so 
> the call must return the next position to continue the scan. This is typical 
> use case for online applications.
> Based on this requirement, some improvements are proposed:
> 1. Allow client set a flag whether pass the heartbeat (a result contains the 
> scanner position) to the caller (via ResultScanner next)
> 2. Allow the client pass a timeout to the server, which can override the 
> server side default value
> 3. When requested by the client, the server peek the next cell and return to 
> the client in the heartbeat message



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to