[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14735703#comment-14735703
]
Enis Soztutar commented on HBASE-14370:
---------------------------------------
bq. w.r.t. thread leak, have you seen the following code ?
Ok, missed that.
bq. Do you think tighter coordination is needed between the zk thread and the
refresher thread ?
In theory, there maybe a race where one thread is refreshing the table auths,
while the other is deleting that permission since now, they will be executing
in different threads. Maybe we can make every operation
(nodeCreated,nodeDeleted,nodeDataChanged,nodeChildrenChanged) to execute from
the executor.
> Use separate thread for calling ZKPermissionWatcher#refreshNodes()
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-14370
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14370
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.98.0
> Reporter: Ted Yu
> Assignee: Ted Yu
> Attachments: 14370-v1.txt, 14370-v3.txt
>
>
> I came off a support case (0.98.0) where main zk thread was seen doing the
> following:
> {code}
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.security.access.ZKPermissionWatcher.refreshAuthManager(ZKPermissionWatcher.java:152)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.security.access.ZKPermissionWatcher.refreshNodes(ZKPermissionWatcher.java:135)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.security.access.ZKPermissionWatcher.nodeChildrenChanged(ZKPermissionWatcher.java:121)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.zookeeper.ZooKeeperWatcher.process(ZooKeeperWatcher.java:348)
> at
> org.apache.zookeeper.ClientCnxn$EventThread.processEvent(ClientCnxn.java:519)
> at org.apache.zookeeper.ClientCnxn$EventThread.run(ClientCnxn.java:495)
> {code}
> There were 62000 nodes under /acl due to lack of fix from HBASE-12635,
> leading to slowness in table creation because zk notification for region
> offline was blocked by the above.
> The attached patch separates refreshNodes() call into its own thread.
> Thanks to Enis and Devaraj for offline discussion.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
