[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14791601#comment-14791601
]
stack commented on HBASE-11590:
-------------------------------
Should we down the keepalive timeout so it is seconds only? We have
allowCoreThreadTimeOut(true); Core threads would run up to the max but could
also go down to zero as is noted in
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19528304/how-to-get-the-threadpoolexecutor-to-increase-threads-to-max-before-queueing/19528305#19528305
Or the suggestion by Ralph H at answered Oct 23 '13 at 10:15 in the link
looks simple (after executing the current reset the core thread size if not
enough for current requests). There is a new answer on the end... with a GPL
soln.
> use a specific ThreadPoolExecutor
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-11590
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11590
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Client, Performance
> Affects Versions: 1.0.0, 2.0.0
> Reporter: Nicolas Liochon
> Assignee: Nicolas Liochon
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: tp.patch
>
>
> The JDK TPE creates all the threads in the pool. As a consequence, we create
> (by default) 256 threads even if we just need a few.
> The attached TPE create threads only if we have something in the queue.
> On a PE test with replica on, it improved the 99 latency percentile by 5%.
> Warning: there are likely some race conditions, but I'm posting it here
> because there is may be an implementation available somewhere we can use, or
> a good reason not to do that. So feedback welcome as usual.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
