[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14906182#comment-14906182
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-13819:
-----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12762094/HBASE-13819.patch
  against master branch at commit 5b7894f92ba3e9ff700da1e9194ebb4774d8b71e.
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12762094

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:red}-1 tests included{color}.  The patch doesn't appear to include 
any new or modified tests.
                        Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
                        Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

    {color:green}+1 hadoop versions{color}. The patch compiles with all 
supported hadoop versions (2.4.0 2.4.1 2.5.0 2.5.1 2.5.2 2.6.0 2.7.0 2.7.1)

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 protoc{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of protoc compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool did not generate any 
warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 checkstyle{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of checkstyle errors

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any  new 
Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch does not introduce lines 
longer than 100

  {color:green}+1 site{color}.  The mvn post-site goal succeeds with this patch.

     {color:red}-1 core tests{color}.  The patch failed these unit tests:
     

     {color:red}-1 core zombie tests{color}.  There are 1 zombie test(s): 

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/15714//testReport/
Release Findbugs (version 2.0.3)        warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/15714//artifact/patchprocess/newFindbugsWarnings.html
Checkstyle Errors: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/15714//artifact/patchprocess/checkstyle-aggregate.html

  Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/15714//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Make RPC layer CellBlock buffer a DirectByteBuffer
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-13819
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13819
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Scanners
>            Reporter: Anoop Sam John
>            Assignee: Anoop Sam John
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-13819.patch
>
>
> In RPC layer, when we make a cellBlock to put as RPC payload, we will make an 
> on heap byte buffer (via BoundedByteBufferPool). The pool will keep upto 
> certain number of buffers. This jira aims at testing possibility for making 
> this buffers off heap ones. (DBB)  The advantages
> 1. Unsafe based writes to off heap is faster than that to on heap. Now we are 
> not using unsafe based writes at all. Even if we add, DBB will be better
> 2. When Cells are backed by off heap (HBASE-11425) off heap to off heap 
> writes will be better
> 3. When checked the code in SocketChannel impl, if we pass a HeapByteBuffer 
> to the socket channel, it will create a temp DBB and copy data to there and 
> only DBBs will be moved to Sockets. If we make DBB 1st hand itself, we can  
> avoid this one more level of copying.
> Will do different perf testing with changed and report back.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to