[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14939378#comment-14939378
]
Ashish Singhi commented on HBASE-13153:
---------------------------------------
bq. Please fill in release notes
Will do in some time.
Adding well documented public methods or broadening the scope of a package
private class to a public in a {{@InterfaceAudience.Public}},
{{@InterfaceStability.Stable}} class should not cause any compatibility issues
IMO.
In my first patch I have done something like that to {{LoadIncrementalHFiles}}
class. [~mbertozzi], do you have any concerns with it ?
> Bulk Loaded HFile Replication
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-13153
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13153
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Replication
> Reporter: sunhaitao
> Assignee: Ashish Singhi
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-13153.patch, HBase Bulk Load Replication-v1-1.pdf,
> HBase Bulk Load Replication.pdf
>
>
> Currently we plan to use HBase Replication feature to deal with disaster
> tolerance scenario.But we encounter an issue that we will use bulkload very
> frequently,because bulkload bypass write path, and will not generate WAL, so
> the data will not be replicated to backup cluster. It's inappropriate to
> bukload twice both on active cluster and backup cluster. So i advise do some
> modification to bulkload feature to enable bukload to both active cluster and
> backup cluster
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
