[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14479?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14954471#comment-14954471
]
stack commented on HBASE-14479:
-------------------------------
bq. (It seems a strange usage but I want to put it aside for now).
Does this mean you want to change the patch or just that you think it fine as
is; it is just that the implementation is a little odd (all executors are
contending on single instance of the Reader Runnable)?
bq. That intends just event dispatching while key != null (corresponding to the
transition following->processing)
... hmm. I think I should just run this and see how it operates in action if
only for my own education.
> Apply the Leader/Followers pattern to RpcServer's Reader
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-14479
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14479
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: IPC/RPC, Performance
> Reporter: Hiroshi Ikeda
> Assignee: Hiroshi Ikeda
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: HBASE-14479-V2 (1).patch, HBASE-14479-V2.patch,
> HBASE-14479-V2.patch, HBASE-14479.patch, gc.png, gets.png, io.png, median.png
>
>
> {{RpcServer}} uses multiple selectors to read data for load distribution, but
> the distribution is just done by round-robin. It is uncertain, especially for
> long run, whether load is equally divided and resources are used without
> being wasted.
> Moreover, multiple selectors may cause excessive context switches which give
> priority to low latency (while we just add the requests to queues), and it is
> possible to reduce throughput of the whole server.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
