[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14999910#comment-14999910
 ] 

Yu Li commented on HBASE-14790:
-------------------------------

[~Apache9]
{quote}
So a simple solution is, when logging failed, try closing the file
{quote}
AFAICS, our current code base has such logic:
{code:title=FSHLog$SyncRunner#run, line 1220|borderStyle=solid}
try {
  ...
  writer.sync();
  ...
} catch (IOException e) {
  LOG.error("Error syncing, request close of WAL", e);
  lastException = e;
} catch (Exception e) {
  LOG.warn("UNEXPECTED", e);
  lastException = e;
} finally {
  ...
  if (lastException != null) requestLogRoll();
  else checkLogRoll();
}
{code}
Mind further explain the difference in the new design? Thanks.

> Implement a new DFSOutputStream for logging WAL only
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-14790
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14790
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Duo Zhang
>
> The original {{DFSOutputStream}} is very powerful and aims to serve all 
> purposes. But in fact, we do not need most of the features if we only want to 
> log WAL. For example, we do not need pipeline recovery since we could just 
> close the old logger and open a new one. And also, we do not need to write 
> multiple blocks since we could also open a new logger if the old file is too 
> large.
> And the most important thing is that, it is hard to handle all the corner 
> cases to avoid data loss or data inconsistency(such as HBASE-14004) when 
> using original DFSOutputStream due to its complicated logic. And the 
> complicated logic also force us to use some magical tricks to increase 
> performance. For example, we need to use multiple threads to call {{hflush}} 
> when logging, and now we use 5 threads. But why 5 not 10 or 100?
> So here, I propose we should implement our own {{DFSOutputStream}} when 
> logging WAL. For correctness, and also for performance.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to