[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15001083#comment-15001083
]
Ted Malaska commented on HBASE-14789:
-------------------------------------
Hey Zhan,
I'm not sure I understand the question.
What I'm thinking is the changes you are asking for should fit nicely into the
existing code.
And we can use the sub jira to discuss the implementations of each. Example
with the Scan implementation I would like to ask if that functionality could be
added to tableInputFormat because it could be of value to more then just
SparkSQL and because we can consolidate code. For the BulkGet implementation I
would like to see some performance tests to make sure we are not introducing
latancy, also if we should use the existing BulkGet functionality in
HBase-Spark because we might want to execute the gets in more then one task.
But lets have this discussions in the sub jiras, for they are completely
different components that are not dependent on each other.
Thanks
> Provide an alternative spark-hbase connector
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-14789
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14789
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Zhan Zhang
> Assignee: Zhan Zhang
> Attachments: shc.pdf
>
>
> This JIRA is to provide user an option to choose different Spark-HBase
> implementation based on requirements.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
