[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15036441#comment-15036441
]
Nate Edel commented on HBASE-11843:
-----------------------------------
This is looking bigger, and probably difficult to review especially coming from
a relative newb. I've broken things up into subtasks, and this should be
easier to review.
> MapReduce classes shouldn't be in hbase-server
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-11843
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11843
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: build
> Reporter: Keegan Witt
> Assignee: Nate Edel
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> I'm opening this to continue the discussion I started a while back:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hbase-user/201405.mbox/%3ccamuu0w_xooxeg779rrfjturau+uxeavunzxkw9dxfo-gh5y...@mail.gmail.com%3E.
> To summarize, I think the MapReduce classes used by clients (like
> TableMapper, TableReducer, etc) don't belong in hbase-server. This forces
> the user to pull in a rather large artifact for a relatively small number of
> classes. These should either be put in hbase-client, or possibly an artifact
> of their own (like the hbase-mapreduce idea Enis suggested).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)