[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14611?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15069591#comment-15069591
 ] 

linbao111 commented on HBASE-14611:
-----------------------------------

more to be added,i think hbase.master.balancer.regionLocationCacheTime default 
value after patch did a serious impact on hdfs
namenode(hdfs-audit.log become huge,and full of hmaster accessing)

so if any one update to hbase 0.98.16.1,rememer to add  
hbase.master.balancer.regionLocationCacheTime to be 30*2*60 in hbase-site.xml,

> Backport HBASE-14473 (Compute region locality in parallel) to 0.98
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-14611
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14611
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Andrew Purtell
>            Assignee: Andrew Purtell
>             Fix For: 0.98.16
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-14611-0.98.patch
>
>
> [~eclark] contributed a nice change on HBASE-14473 that scales calculation of 
> locality balance cost to larger clusters. I'd like to bring this back to 0.98 
> for folks running it on larger clusters. The changes require a partial 
> rewrite of RegionLocationFinder hence a backport issue.
> The difference between this backport and RegionLocationFinder on later 
> branches is we preserve the ability to change the expiration time of cache 
> items with the configuration parameter 
> "hbase.master.balancer.regionLocationCacheTime". 
> The difference between RegionLocationFinder in 0.98 before and after this 
> change is the expiration time of cache entries will be set according to when 
> they are written into the cache instead of from when they are last accessed, 
> which seems better to me.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to