[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15133352#comment-15133352
]
Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-15177:
----------------------------------------
bq. Findbugs came in with HBASE-15200
Oops will fix there
> Reduce garbage created under high load
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-15177
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15177
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Enis Soztutar
> Assignee: Enis Soztutar
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.3.0
>
> Attachments: Screen Shot 2016-01-26 at 10.03.48 PM.png, Screen Shot
> 2016-01-26 at 10.03.56 PM.png, Screen Shot 2016-01-26 at 10.06.16 PM.png,
> Screen Shot 2016-01-26 at 10.15.15 PM.png, hbase-15177_v0.patch,
> hbase-15177_v1.patch, hbase-15177_v2.patch, hbase-15177_v3.patch,
> hbase-15177_v4.patch, hbase-15177_v4.patch
>
>
> I have been doing some profiling of the garbage being created. The idea was
> to follow up on HBASE-14490 and experiment with offheap IPC byte buffers and
> byte buffer re-use. However, without changing the IPC byte buffers for now,
> there are a couple of (easy) improvements that I've identified from
> profiling:
> 1. RPCServer.Connection.processRequest() should work with ByteBuffer instead
> of byte[] and not-recreate CodedInputStream a few times.
> 2. RSRpcServices.getRegion() allocates two byte arrays for region, while only
> 1 is needed.
> 3. AnnotationReadingPriorityFunction is very expensive in allocations. Mainly
> it allocates the regionName byte[] to get the table name. We already set the
> priority for most of the operations (multi, get, increment, etc) but we are
> only reading the priority in case of multi. We should use the priority from
> the client side.
> Lets do the simple improvements in this patch, we can get to IPC buffer
> re-use in HBASE-14490.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
