[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15134157#comment-15134157
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-15213:
-----------------------------------

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hbaseanti {color} | {color:green} 0m 
0s {color} | {color:green} Patch does not have any anti-patterns. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please 
list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 7m 
37s {color} | {color:green} branch-1.0 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 42s 
{color} | {color:green} branch-1.0 passed with JDK v1.8.0_72 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 34s 
{color} | {color:green} branch-1.0 passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m 
21s {color} | {color:green} branch-1.0 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
19s {color} | {color:green} branch-1.0 passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} findbugs {color} | {color:red} 1m 44s 
{color} | {color:red} hbase-server in branch-1.0 has 61 extant Findbugs 
warnings. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javadoc {color} | {color:red} 0m 36s 
{color} | {color:red} hbase-server in branch-1.0 failed with JDK v1.8.0_72. 
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 36s 
{color} | {color:green} branch-1.0 passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m 
40s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 42s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_72 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 42s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 36s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 36s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m 
14s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
15s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m 
0s {color} | {color:green} Patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hadoopcheck {color} | {color:green} 4m 
33s {color} | {color:green} Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 2.4.1 
2.5.2 2.6.0. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} findbugs {color} | {color:red} 2m 10s 
{color} | {color:red} hbase-server introduced 1 new FindBugs issues. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javadoc {color} | {color:red} 0m 34s 
{color} | {color:red} hbase-server in the patch failed with JDK v1.8.0_72. 
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 36s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 92m 9s 
{color} | {color:green} hbase-server in the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_72. 
{color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 89m 38s {color} 
| {color:red} hbase-server in the patch failed with JDK v1.7.0_95. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m 
18s {color} | {color:green} Patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 222m 44s {color} 
| {color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| FindBugs | module:hbase-server |
|  |  Nullcheck of waitedEntry at line 245 of value previously dereferenced in 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.MultiVersionConsistencyControl.waitForPreviousTransactionsComplete(MultiVersionConsistencyControl$WriteEntry)
  At MultiVersionConsistencyControl.java:245 of value previously dereferenced 
in 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.MultiVersionConsistencyControl.waitForPreviousTransactionsComplete(MultiVersionConsistencyControl$WriteEntry)
  At MultiVersionConsistencyControl.java:[line 216] |
| JDK v1.7.0_95 Failed junit tests | 
hadoop.hbase.coprocessor.TestMasterObserver |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=1.9.1 Server=1.9.1 Image:yetus/hbase:date2016-02-05 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12786444/HBASE-15213.v1.branch-1.0.patch
 |
| JIRA Issue | HBASE-15213 |
| Optional Tests |  asflicense  javac  javadoc  unit  findbugs  hadoopcheck  
hbaseanti  checkstyle  compile  |
| uname | Linux 32abe230c42a 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed 
Sep 3 21:56:12 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/hbase.sh |
| git revision | branch-1.0 / 7f42fcd |
| findbugs | v3.0.0 |
| findbugs | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/437/artifact/patchprocess/branch-findbugs-hbase-server-warnings.html
 |
| javadoc | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/437/artifact/patchprocess/branch-javadoc-hbase-server-jdk1.8.0_72.txt
 |
| findbugs | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/437/artifact/patchprocess/new-findbugs-hbase-server.html
 |
| javadoc | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/437/artifact/patchprocess/patch-javadoc-hbase-server-jdk1.8.0_72.txt
 |
| unit | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/437/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hbase-server-jdk1.7.0_95.txt
 |
| unit test logs |  
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/437/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hbase-server-jdk1.7.0_95.txt
 |
| JDK v1.7.0_95  Test Results | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/437/testReport/ |
| modules | C: hbase-server U: hbase-server |
| Max memory used | 110MB |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.1.0   http://yetus.apache.org |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/437/console |


This message was automatically generated.



> Fix increment performance regression caused by HBASE-8763 on branch-1.0
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-15213
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15213
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Performance
>            Reporter: Junegunn Choi
>            Assignee: Junegunn Choi
>         Attachments: HBASE-15213-increment.png, HBASE-15213.branch-1.0.patch, 
> HBASE-15213.v1.branch-1.0.patch
>
>
> This is an attempt to fix the increment performance regression caused by 
> HBASE-8763 on branch-1.0.
> I'm aware that hbase.increment.fast.but.narrow.consistency was added to 
> branch-1.0 (HBASE-15031) to address the issue and a separate work is ongoing 
> on master branch, but anyway, this is my take on the problem.
> I read through HBASE-14460 and HBASE-8763 but it wasn't clear to me what 
> caused the slowdown but I could indeed reproduce the performance regression.
> Test setup:
> - Server: 4-core Xeon 2.4GHz Linux server running mini cluster (100 handlers, 
> JDK 1.7)
> - Client: Another box of the same spec
> - Increments on random 10k records on a single-region table, recreated every 
> time
> Increment throughput (TPS):
> || Num threads || Before HBASE-8763 (d6cc2fb) || branch-1.0 || branch-1.0 
> (narrow-consistency) ||
> || 1            | 2661                         | 2486        | 2359  |
> || 2            | 5048                         | 5064        | 4867  |
> || 4            | 7503                         | 8071        | 8690  |
> || 8            | 10471                        | 10886       | 13980 |
> || 16           | 15515                        | 9418        | 18601 |
> || 32           | 17699                        | 5421        | 20540 |
> || 64           | 20601                        | 4038        | 25591 |
> || 96           | 19177                        | 3891        | 26017 |
> We can clearly observe that the throughtput degrades as we increase the 
> number of concurrent requests, which led me to believe that there's severe 
> context switching overhead and I could indirectly confirm that suspicion with 
> cs entry in vmstat output. branch-1.0 shows a much higher number of context 
> switches even with much lower throughput.
> Here are the observations:
> - WriteEntry in the writeQueue can only be removed by the very handler that 
> put it, only when it is at the front of the queue and marked complete.
> - Since a WriteEntry is marked complete after the wait-loop, only one entry 
> can be removed at a time.
> - This stringent condition causes O(N^2) context switches where n is the 
> number of concurrent handlers processing requests.
> So what I tried here is to mark WriteEntry complete before we go into 
> wait-loop. With the change, multiple WriteEntries can be shifted at a time 
> without context switches. I changed writeQueue to LinkedHashSet since fast 
> containment check is needed as WriteEntry can be removed by any handler.
> The numbers look good, it's virtually identical to pre-HBASE-8763 era.
> || Num threads || branch-1.0 with fix ||
> || 1            | 2459                 |
> || 2            | 4976                 |
> || 4            | 8033                 |
> || 8            | 12292                |
> || 16           | 15234                |
> || 32           | 16601                |
> || 64           | 19994                |
> || 96           | 20052                |
> So what do you think about it? Please let me know if I'm missing anything.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to