[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15138355#comment-15138355
]
stack commented on HBASE-12751:
-------------------------------
[~eclark] Nice side effect
Regards HBASE-15047, as said before... radical. HBASE-15082 is in now (smile).
> Allow RowLock to be reader writer
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-12751
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12751
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: regionserver
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.3.0
> Reporter: Elliott Clark
> Assignee: stack
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: 12751.rebased.v25.txt, 12751.rebased.v26.txt,
> 12751.rebased.v26.txt, 12751.rebased.v27.txt, 12751.rebased.v29.txt,
> 12751.rebased.v31.txt, 12751.rebased.v32.txt, 12751.rebased.v32.txt,
> 12751.rebased.v33.txt, 12751.rebased.v34.txt, 12751.rebased.v35.txt,
> 12751.rebased.v35.txt, 12751.rebased.v35.txt, 12751.v37.txt, 12751.v38.txt,
> 12751.v39.txt, 12751.v40.txt, 12751.v41.txt, 12751v22.txt, 12751v23.txt,
> 12751v23.txt, 12751v23.txt, 12751v23.txt, 12751v36.txt, HBASE-12751-v1.patch,
> HBASE-12751-v10.patch, HBASE-12751-v10.patch, HBASE-12751-v11.patch,
> HBASE-12751-v12.patch, HBASE-12751-v13.patch, HBASE-12751-v14.patch,
> HBASE-12751-v15.patch, HBASE-12751-v16.patch, HBASE-12751-v17.patch,
> HBASE-12751-v18.patch, HBASE-12751-v19 (1).patch, HBASE-12751-v19.patch,
> HBASE-12751-v2.patch, HBASE-12751-v20.patch, HBASE-12751-v20.patch,
> HBASE-12751-v21.patch, HBASE-12751-v3.patch, HBASE-12751-v4.patch,
> HBASE-12751-v5.patch, HBASE-12751-v6.patch, HBASE-12751-v7.patch,
> HBASE-12751-v8.patch, HBASE-12751-v9.patch, HBASE-12751.patch
>
>
> Right now every write operation grabs a row lock. This is to prevent values
> from changing during a read modify write operation (increment or check and
> put). However it limits parallelism in several different scenarios.
> If there are several puts to the same row but different columns or stores
> then this is very limiting.
> If there are puts to the same column then mvcc number should ensure a
> consistent ordering. So locking is not needed.
> However locking for check and put or increment is still needed.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
