[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15154509#comment-15154509
]
stack commented on HBASE-15264:
-------------------------------
So, WAL goes bad, we abandon it and replay unacked edits into new file.
bq. ....if we failed to close the WAL file current being written , it is likely
that we are considered dead on master.
So, we should not be writing a new file that is subsequent to the WAL that
broke and that we cannot reach anymore? If we 'lose' a WAL -- can't write it or
close it -- then we should not start a new one?
> Implement a fan out HDFS OutputStream
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-15264
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15264
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: util, wal
> Reporter: Duo Zhang
> Assignee: Duo Zhang
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-15264-v1.patch, HBASE-15264-v2.patch,
> HBASE-15264-v3.patch, HBASE-15264-v4.patch, HBASE-15264.patch
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
