[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15157419#comment-15157419
 ] 

Sean Busbey commented on HBASE-13883:
-------------------------------------

bq. As a follow on, Sean Busbey does enabling multiwal deserve bumping up the 
hbase.regionserer.max.logs value?

Nah. The settings has been deprecated in preference for a calculated default.

{code}
    boolean maxLogsDefined = conf.get("hbase.regionserver.maxlogs") != null;
    if(maxLogsDefined){
      LOG.warn("'hbase.regionserver.maxlogs' was deprecated.");
    }
    this.maxLogs = conf.getInt("hbase.regionserver.maxlogs",
        Math.max(32, calculateMaxLogFiles(memstoreRatio, logrollsize)));
{code}

Also it's already done per WAL pipeline, so you get more when you enable 
multiwal.


> Fix Memstore Flush section in HBase book
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-13883
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13883
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: documentation
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Vladimir Rodionov
>            Assignee: Misty Stanley-Jones
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-13883.patch
>
>
> {quote}
> 65.7.2. MemStore Flush
> A MemStore flush can be triggered under any of the conditions listed below. 
> The minimum flush unit is per region, not at individual MemStore level.
>  // SKIPPED
>     3. When the number of WAL per region server reaches the value specified 
> in hbase.regionserver.max.logs, MemStores from various regions will be 
> flushed out to disk to reduce WAL count. The flush order is based on time. 
> Regions with the oldest MemStores are flushed first until WAL count drops 
> below hbase.regionserver.max.logs.
> {quote}
> Section 3. requires clarification (reference to HBase version which supports 
> this). Is it MultiWAL feature in 1.0? 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to