[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15158737#comment-15158737
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-14735:
-----------------------------------
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 0s
{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hbaseanti {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s {color} | {color:green} Patch does not have any anti-patterns. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red} 0m 0s
{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified
tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please
list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 2m
59s {color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 30s
{color} | {color:green} master passed with JDK v1.8.0_72 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 34s
{color} | {color:green} master passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 4m
15s {color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m
17s {color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
49s {color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 25s
{color} | {color:green} master passed with JDK v1.8.0_72 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 34s
{color} | {color:green} master passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
45s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 30s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_72 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 30s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 34s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 34s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 4m
17s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m
17s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s {color} | {color:green} Patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hadoopcheck {color} | {color:green}
23m 45s {color} | {color:green} Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop
2.4.0 2.4.1 2.5.0 2.5.1 2.5.2 2.6.1 2.6.2 2.6.3 2.7.1. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
58s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 24s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_72 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 33s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 79m 26s
{color} | {color:green} hbase-server in the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_72.
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 88m 35s
{color} | {color:green} hbase-server in the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95.
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
21s {color} | {color:green} Patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 213m 16s {color}
| {color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=1.9.1 Server=1.9.1 Image:yetus/hbase:date2016-02-23 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12771901/14735-branch-1.2.patch
|
| JIRA Issue | HBASE-14735 |
| Optional Tests | asflicense javac javadoc unit findbugs hadoopcheck
hbaseanti checkstyle compile |
| uname | Linux bd511ce503a8 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed
Sep 3 21:56:12 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality |
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/component/dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
|
| git revision | master / a8073c4 |
| findbugs | v3.0.0 |
| JDK v1.7.0_95 Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/647/testReport/ |
| modules | C: hbase-server U: hbase-server |
| Max memory used | 186MB |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.1.0 http://yetus.apache.org |
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/647/console |
This message was automatically generated.
> Region may grow too big and can not be split
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-14735
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14735
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Compaction, regionserver
> Affects Versions: 1.1.2, 0.98.15
> Reporter: Shuaifeng Zhou
> Assignee: Shuaifeng Zhou
> Attachments: 14735-0.98.patch, 14735-branch-1.1.patch,
> 14735-branch-1.2.patch, 14735-branch-1.2.patch, 14735-master (2).patch,
> 14735-master.patch, 14735-master.patch
>
>
> When a compaction completed, may there are also many storefiles in the store,
> and CompactPriority < 0, then compactSplitThread will do a "Recursive
> enqueue" compaction request instead of request a split:
> {code:title=CompactSplitThread.java|borderStyle=solid}
> if (completed) {
> // degenerate case: blocked regions require recursive enqueues
> if (store.getCompactPriority() <= 0) {
> requestSystemCompaction(region, store, "Recursive enqueue");
> } else {
> // see if the compaction has caused us to exceed max region size
> requestSplit(region);
> }
> {code}
> But in some situation, the "recursive enqueue" request may return null, and
> not build up a new compaction runner. For example, an other compaction of the
> same region is running, and compaction selection will exclude all files older
> than the newest files currently compacting, this may cause no enough files
> can be selected by the "recursive enqueue" request. When this happen, split
> will not be trigged. If the input load is high enough, compactions aways
> running on the region, and split will never be triggered.
> In our cluster, this situation happened, and a huge region more than 400GB
> and 100+ storefiles appeared. Version is 0.98.10, and the trank also have the
> problem.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
