[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ramkrishna.s.vasudevan updated HBASE-15205:
-------------------------------------------
    Attachment: HBASE-15205_8.patch

Latest patch. Removed replicationScope from FSWALEntry. WALKey construction 
itself will now have replicationScope. As I said earlier since we are now 
passing the scope during WALKey construction itself now it is upto us to 
nullify the scopes in logKey when ever it is not needed. I felt that was not 
looking clean. Still we are removing HTD from WAL#append() and things work as 
in previous patches. 
Now we will call this 
{code}
+    if ((!replicationForBulkLoadEnabled && !foundOtherEdits) || 
logEdit.isReplay()) {
+      logKey.serializeReplicationScope(false);
     }
{code}
instead of setReplciationScope(). Inside WALKEy#serializeReplicationScope() we 
will just nullify the replicationScope that was passed during construction. 


> Do not find the replication scope for every WAL#append()
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-15205
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15205
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: regionserver
>            Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>            Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-15204_6.patch, HBASE-15205.patch, 
> HBASE-15205_1.patch, HBASE-15205_2.patch, HBASE-15205_3.patch, 
> HBASE-15205_4.patch, HBASE-15205_6.patch, HBASE-15205_6.patch, 
> HBASE-15205_7.patch, HBASE-15205_8.patch, ScopeWALEdits.jpg, 
> ScopeWALEdits_afterpatch.jpg
>
>
> After the byte[] and char[] the other top contributor for lot of GC (though 
> it is only 2.86%) is the UTF_8.newDecoder.
> This happens because for every WAL append we try to calculate the replication 
> scope associate with the families associated with the TableDescriptor. I 
> think per WAL append doing this is very costly and creates lot of garbage. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to