[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15173181#comment-15173181
 ] 

Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-15339:
-----------------------------------

For example, usually we consider hot data to be 'data that written in the last 
7 days', not 'data that written after last Monday', that's why a moving window 
is more suitable to determine hot data.

And for the archive logic, there is a max age config which we will skip 
compaction on files older than this. I think we could do archive on these files?

Thanks.

> Add archive tiers for date based tiered compaction
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-15339
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15339
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Compaction
>            Reporter: Duo Zhang
>
> For our MiCloud service, the old data is rarely touched but we still need to 
> keep it, so we want to put the data on inexpensive device and reduce 
> redundancy using EC to cut down the cost.
> With date based tiered compaction introduced in HBASE-15181, new data and old 
> data can be placed in different tier. But the tier boundary moves as time 
> lapse so it is still possible that we do compaction on old tier which breaks 
> our block moving and EC work.
> So here we want to introduce an "archive tier" to better fit our scenario. 
> Add an configuration called "archive unit", for example, year. That means, if 
> we find that the tier boundary is already in the previous year, then we reset 
> the boundary to the start of year and end of year, and if we want to do 
> compaction in this tier, just compact all files into one file. The file will 
> never be changed unless we force a major compaction so it is safe to apply EC 
> and other cost reducing approach on the file. And we make more tiers before 
> this tier year by year. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to