[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15186478#comment-15186478
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-15325:
------------------------------------------------
So the final conclusion is that we are not going to treat BATCH_LIMIT_REACH as
partial on the server side because the result returned to the cleint will have
the isPartial() set on it. And hence only the client side change is going to be
applied as in the current patch and in addition to it if in setBatch we get
lesser results we will again fetch from that lastResult of that batch, right?
> ResultScanner allowing partial result will miss the rest of the row if the
> region is moved between two rpc requests
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-15325
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15325
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: dataloss, Scanners
> Affects Versions: 1.2.0, 1.1.3
> Reporter: Phil Yang
> Assignee: Phil Yang
> Priority: Critical
> Attachments: 15325-test.txt, HBASE-15325-v1.txt, HBASE-15325-v2.txt,
> HBASE-15325-v3.txt, HBASE-15325-v5.txt, HBASE-15325-v6.1.txt,
> HBASE-15325-v6.2.txt, HBASE-15325-v6.3.txt, HBASE-15325-v6.4.txt,
> HBASE-15325-v6.5.txt, HBASE-15325-v6.txt
>
>
> HBASE-11544 allow scan rpc return partial of a row to reduce memory usage for
> one rpc request. And client can setAllowPartial or setBatch to get several
> cells in a row instead of the whole row.
> However, the status of the scanner is saved on server and we need this to get
> the next part if there is a partial result before. If we move the region to
> another RS, client will get a NotServingRegionException and open a new
> scanner to the new RS which will be regarded as a new scan from the end of
> this row. So the rest cells of the row of last result will be missing.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
