[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13150046#comment-13150046
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-4718:
----------------------------------
-1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12503685/hbase-4718.v4.patch
against trunk revision .
+1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
+1 tests included. The patch appears to include 10 new or modified tests.
-1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch.
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/247//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Backport HBASE-4552 to 0.90 branch.
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-4718
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4718
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.90.4
> Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh
> Assignee: Jonathan Hsieh
> Fix For: 0.90.5
>
> Attachments: 4718-v2.90, hbase-4718.0.90.patch,
> hbase-4718.v3.includes-hbase-3316.patch, hbase-4718.v4.patch
>
>
> In discussion of HBASE-4552 / HBASE-4677 there has been some discussion about
> whether and how to backport HBASE-4552 to the 0.90 branch. This is a
> potentially compatibility breaking so several approaches hav ebeen suggested.
> 1) provide patch but do not integrate
> 2) integrate patch that extends and deprecates old api without removing old
> api. It has been argued that clients are supposed to use
> LoadIncrementalHFiles api and not at the internal HRegionServer RPC api.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
