[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15202983#comment-15202983
 ] 

Yu Li commented on HBASE-15490:
-------------------------------

>From the [test 
>report|https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/1089/testReport/] 
>we could see the only failed UT case is 
>{{TestFailedAppendAndSync#testLockupAroundBadAssignSync}}, which is tracked by 
>HBASE-15307 and irrelative to the change here (also confirmed it could pass in 
>local).

Will commit the patch after review.

> Two CompactionThroughputControllerFactory co-exist in branch-1
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-15490
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15490
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.3.0
>            Reporter: Yu Li
>            Assignee: Yu Li
>         Attachments: HBASE-15490.branch-1.patch, HBASE-15490.patch
>
>
> Currently there're two {{CompactionThroughputControllerFactory}} in our 
> branch-1 code base (one in {{o.a.h.h.regionserver.compactions}} package, the 
> other in {{o.a.h.h.regionserver.throttle}}) and both are in use.
> This is a regression of HBASE-14969 and only exists in branch-1. We should 
> remove the one  in {{o.a.h.h.regionserver.compactions}}, and change the 
> default compaction throughput controller back to 
> {{NoLimitThroughputController}} to keep compatible with previous branch-1 
> version
> Thanks [~ghelmling] for pointing out the issue.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to