[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15537?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15223638#comment-15223638
]
stack commented on HBASE-15537:
-------------------------------
Skimmed. Looks great.+1
[~busbey] when you get a chance, your blessing please.
If I were to do a report on multiWAL compared to singleWAL, is there anything
to ensure that different DNs are used by each asyncwal instance when running in
a multiwal setup?
> Add multi WAL support for AsyncFSWAL
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-15537
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15537
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Duo Zhang
> Assignee: Duo Zhang
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-15537-v3.patch, HBASE-15537-v4.patch,
> HBASE-15537.patch, HBASE-15537_v2.patch
>
>
> The multi WAL should not be bound with {{FSHLog}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
