[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15756?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15273504#comment-15273504
]
Yu Li commented on HBASE-15756:
-------------------------------
bq. I was suggesting not bothering w/ pluggable aspect because when options,
users near always go with whatever is the default. If netty superior – perf,
options – then lets just move there wholesale.
I see, but it seems offheap work would be affected if we completely move to
netty? Collaboration needed here with Anoop and Ram, right?
bq. If you have a patch for netty, put it up and I'll give it a go.
No problem. We were testing with branch-1, so the patch is also for branch-1,
is this ok or prefer a master-branch one?
> Pluggable RpcServer
> -------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-15756
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15756
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: binlijin
> Assignee: binlijin
>
> Current we use a simple RpcServer, and can not configure and use other
> implementation.This issue is to make the RpcServer pluggable, so we can make
> other implementation for example netty rpc server. Patch will upload laterly
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
