[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15283038#comment-15283038
 ] 

Jerry He commented on HBASE-15403:
----------------------------------

Recently when I ran PerformanceEvaluation, I did notice some problem with the 
number of rows.  It was not exactly the same problem described in this JIRA.

hbase org.apache.hadoop.hbase.PerformanceEvaluation --table=TestTable1 
randomWrite 1
hbase org.apache.hadoop.hbase.PerformanceEvaluation --table=TestTable5 
randomWrite 5
hbase org.apache.hadoop.hbase.PerformanceEvaluation --table=TestTable10 
randomWrite 10
hbase org.apache.hadoop.hbase.PerformanceEvaluation --table=TestTable10 
randomWrite 20

All produced the same number of rows, and on the file system, they look like in 
similar size as well:

hadoop fs -du -h /apps/hbase/data/data/default

786.5 M  /apps/hbase/data/data/default/TestTable1
786.0 M  /apps/hbase/data/data/default/TestTable10
782.0 M  /apps/hbase/data/data/default/TestTable20
713.4 M  /apps/hbase/data/data/default/TestTable5

HBase is 1.2.0.  Looks like a regression somewhere.




> Performance Evaluation tool isn't working as expected
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-15403
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15403
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Performance
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.0
>            Reporter: Appy
>            Priority: Critical
>
> hbase pe --nomapred --rows=100 --table='t4' randomWrite 10
> # count on t4 gives 620 rows
> hbase pe --nomapred --rows=200 --table='t5' randomWrite 10
> # count on t5 gives 1257 rows
> hbase pe --nomapred --table='t6' --rows=200 randomWrite 1
> # count on t6 gives 126 rows
> I was working with 1.2.0, but it's likely that it'll also be affecting master.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to