[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15317834#comment-15317834
]
Joseph commented on HBASE-15970:
--------------------------------
I'm not super sure yet, but I feel like we would probably use another table.
This one would only be tracking the replication peers, so we would only be
storing cluster-id's as rowkeys? hbase:replication currently tracks queues.
> Move Replication Peers into an HBase table too
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-15970
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15970
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Replication
> Reporter: Joseph
> Assignee: Joseph
>
> Currently ReplicationQueuesHBaseTableImpl relies on ReplicationStateZkImpl to
> track information about the available replication peers (used during
> claimQueues). We can also move this into an HBase table instead of relying on
> ZooKeeper
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
