[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15323410#comment-15323410
]
Gary Helmling commented on HBASE-15921:
---------------------------------------
Yeah, I understand and agree with the motivation there. We definitely want to
be sure that all existing tests pass with AsyncTableImpl. My point is just
that changing the default implementation returned by
ConnectionImplementation.getTable() shouldn't be done yet. A configuration
option changing the implementation used seems like the way to go. After
AsyncTableImpl has seen some real world usage we can look at dropping HTable.
> Add first AsyncTable impl and create TableImpl based on it
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-15921
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15921
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Jurriaan Mous
> Assignee: Jurriaan Mous
> Attachments: HBASE-15921.patch, HBASE-15921.v1.patch
>
>
> First we create an AsyncTable interface with implementation without the Scan
> functionality. Those will land in a separate patch since they need a refactor
> of existing scans.
> Also added is a new TableImpl to replace HTable. It uses the AsyncTableImpl
> internally and should be a bit faster because it does jump through less hoops
> to do ProtoBuf transportation. This way we can run all existing tests on the
> AsyncTableImpl to guarantee its quality.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
