[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

stack updated HBASE-15971:
--------------------------
         Hadoop Flags: Incompatible change,Reviewed
         Release Note: Change the default rpc scheduler from 'deadline' to 
'fifo' instead so it is the same as in branch 0.98. 'deadline' was of 
questionable benefit but with a high cost scheduling. To re-enable 'deadline', 
set hbase.ipc.server.callqueue.type to 'deadline' in your hbase-site.xml.
    Affects Version/s: 1.3.0
                       2.0.0
               Status: Patch Available  (was: Open)

> Regression: Random Read/WorkloadC slower in 1.x than 0.98
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-15971
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15971
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: rpc
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.3.0
>            Reporter: stack
>            Assignee: stack
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: 098.hits.png, 098.png, HBASE-15971.branch-1.001.patch, 
> HBASE-15971.branch-1.002.patch, Screen Shot 2016-06-10 at 5.08.24 PM.png, 
> Screen Shot 2016-06-10 at 5.08.26 PM.png, branch-1.hits.png, branch-1.png, 
> flight_recording_10172402220203_28.branch-1.jfr, 
> flight_recording_10172402220203_29.09820.0.98.20.jfr, handlers.fp.png, 
> hits.fp.png, hits.patched1.0.vs.unpatched1.0.vs.098.png, run_ycsb.sh
>
>
> branch-1 is slower than 0.98 doing YCSB random read/workloadC. It seems to be 
> doing about 1/2 the throughput of 0.98.
> In branch-1, we have low handler occupancy compared to 0.98. Hacking in 
> reader thread occupancy metric, is about the same in both. In parent issue, 
> hacking out the scheduler, I am able to get branch-1 to go 3x faster so will 
> dig in here.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to