[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15340465#comment-15340465
]
Jerry He commented on HBASE-16060:
----------------------------------
[~enis]
I was thinking about doing HBASE-13701. I wondered how that is going to work
out for the Compatibility if I do away the SecureBulkLoadEndpoint but provide
the same service on the RSRpcServices.
> 1.x clients cannot access table state talking to 2.0 cluster
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-16060
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16060
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Enis Soztutar
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> Since table state is migrated to meta instead of zk in 2.0, 1.x clients
> talking to 2.0 cluster cannot access the table state. This causes some weird
> behavior since from a client perspective, {{Admin.isTableEnabled()}} and
> {{Admin.isTableDisabled()}} both return false.
> One option we can do is to add code in 1.x clients so that they can access
> the table state in meta if needed. Otherwise, we can mirror the table state
> in zk (while keeping meta as the source of truth) during 2.x lifecycle so
> that any 1.x client can still work correctly.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
