[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16158?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dima Spivak updated HBASE-16158:
--------------------------------
Attachment: 0.98.0_0.98_compat_report.html
Unrelated, but just for fun, I just ran the script and found some problems
between 0.98.0 and branch 0.98. Attaching script; should we file JIRAs for any
of these?
I'll spend a little bit of time getting familiar with the Yetus personality.
> Automate runs of check_compatibility.sh on upstream infra
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-16158
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16158
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: test
> Reporter: Dima Spivak
> Attachments: 0.98.0_0.98_compat_report.html
>
>
> Now that we got {{check_compatiblity.sh}} working again, perhaps we should
> think about having it run regularly upstream? One possibility would be to tie
> it into Yetus runs so that the tool gets run on every commit between the
> branch in question and a designated Git reference (e.g. branch-1.2 could run
> against the earlier release of the 1.2 line) and simply grepping the output
> to make sure that the number of problems and warnings doesn't exceed a
> designated number. The other would be to run every branch in its own Jenkins
> job following the same workflow, but on a nightly basis. What do you guys and
> gals think would be best?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
