[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15370320#comment-15370320
 ] 

Yu Li commented on HBASE-16194:
-------------------------------

bq. This should be applicable in 0.98+ all branches
Agree, and have prepared commits for all branch-1+ (waiting for HadoopQA), will 
prepare a patch for 0.98 later. [~apurtell] [~ndimiduk] [~busbey] and 
[~mantonov], please let me know if you have any concern to push the patch here 
into relative branch, thanks.

bq. useMSLAB... Better name?
Have added below comments for the parameter in {{internalAdd}}:
{noformat}
+   * @param toAdd the cell to add
+   * @param useMSLAB whether using MSLAB
+   * @return the heap size change in bytes
{noformat}
So maybe we should change the comment to "whether to use MSLAB for the cell"? 
Since the patch already gone into master branch, maybe an addendum here?

> Should count in MSLAB chunk allocation into heap size change when adding 
> duplicate cells
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-16194
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16194
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.1, 1.1.5, 0.98.20
>            Reporter: Yu Li
>            Assignee: Yu Li
>         Attachments: HBASE-16194.branch-1.patch, HBASE-16194.branch-1.patch, 
> HBASE-16194.patch, HBASE-16194_v2.patch
>
>
> See more details about problem description and analysis in HBASE-16193



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to