[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15376465#comment-15376465
 ] 

Yu Li commented on HBASE-16205:
-------------------------------

Nice catch [~anoop.hbase]!

Some suggestions:
1. Should we try to avoid the deep copy when not using MSLAB, in which case 
maybe directly using the backend ByteBuffer has the same effect? Something like:
{code}
    if (getMemStoreLAB() != null && !useMSLAB) {
      cell = CellUtil.deepCopy(cell);
    }
{code}

2. Is it possible to avoid the deep copy when the backend ByteBuffer only 
contains a single cell larger than {{maxAlloc}} size?

> When Cells are not copied to MSLAB, deep clone it while adding to Memstore
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-16205
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16205
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: regionserver
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Anoop Sam John
>            Assignee: Anoop Sam John
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-16205.patch
>
>
> This is imp after HBASE-15180 optimization. After that we the cells flowing 
> in write path will be backed by the same byte[] where the RPC read the 
> request into. By default we have MSLAB On and so we have a copy operation 
> while adding Cells to memstore.  This copy might not be there if
> 1. MSLAB is turned OFF
> 2. Cell size is more than a configurable max size. This defaults to 256 KB
> 3. If the operation is Append/Increment. 
> In such cases, we should just clone the Cell into a new byte[] and then add 
> to memstore.  Or else we keep referring to the bigger byte[] chunk for longer 
> time.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to