[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15384935#comment-15384935
]
Enis Soztutar commented on HBASE-14070:
---------------------------------------
I think so. System monotonic clock will be fully compatible with the existing
data, and we need the monotonicly non-decreasing semantics to be available. If
existing data and applications use the timestamp explicitly (for example table
already has TTL), etc, then we cannot change the table to be HLC. For those
tables, we still want a monotonic clock for correctness.
> Hybrid Logical Clocks for HBase
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-14070
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14070
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Enis Soztutar
> Assignee: Sai Teja Ranuva
> Attachments: HybridLogicalClocksforHBaseandPhoenix.docx,
> HybridLogicalClocksforHBaseandPhoenix.pdf
>
>
> HBase and Phoenix uses systems physical clock (PT) to give timestamps to
> events (read and writes). This works mostly when the system clock is strictly
> monotonically increasing and there is no cross-dependency between servers
> clocks. However we know that leap seconds, general clock skew and clock drift
> are in fact real.
> This jira proposes using Hybrid Logical Clocks (HLC) as an implementation of
> hybrid physical clock + a logical clock. HLC is best of both worlds where it
> keeps causality relationship similar to logical clocks, but still is
> compatible with NTP based physical system clock. HLC can be represented in
> 64bits.
> A design document is attached and also can be found here:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LL2GAodiYi0waBz5ODGL4LDT4e_bXy8P9h6kWC05Bhw/edit#
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
