[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15401420#comment-15401420
 ] 

Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-16296:
---------------------------------------

One would have to analyze the code to see if there'd be a end-to-end different 
behavior possible.

In these scenarios the Cells would be filtered later in SQM anyway, so while 
FilterList might return different values, the actual scanning behavior might 
not change actually change.


> Reverse scan performance degrades when scanner cache size matches page filter 
> size
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-16296
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16296
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: James Taylor
>         Attachments: 16296-MAYBE.txt, generatedata-snippet.java, 
> repro-snippet.java
>
>
> When a reverse scan is done, the server seems to not know it's done when the 
> scanner cache size matches the number of rows in a PageFilter. See 
> PHOENIX-3121 for how this manifests itself. We have a standalone, pure HBase 
> API reproducer too that I'll attach (courtesy of [~churromorales] and 
> [~mujtabachohan]).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to