[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Enis Soztutar updated HBASE-16288:
----------------------------------
Release Note: A new hfile configuration "hfile.index.block.min.entries"
which defaults to 16 determines how many entries the hfile index block can have
at least. The configuration which determines how large the index block can be
at max (hfile.index.block.max.size) is ignored as long as we have fewer than
hfile.index.block.min.entries entries. This ensures that multi-level index does
not build up with too many levels. (was: A new hfile configuration
"hfile.index.block.min.entries" which defaults to 16 determines how many
entries the hfile index block can have at least. The configuration which
determines how large the index block can be at max (hfile.index.block.max.siz)
is ignored as long as we have fewer than hfile.index.block.min.entries entries.
This ensures that multi-level index does not build up with too many levels. )
> HFile intermediate block level indexes might recurse forever creating multi
> TB files
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-16288
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16288
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Enis Soztutar
> Assignee: Enis Soztutar
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.4.0, 1.1.6, 1.2.3
>
> Attachments: hbase-16288_v1.patch, hbase-16288_v2.patch,
> hbase-16288_v3.patch, hbase-16288_v4.patch
>
>
> Mighty [~elserj] was debugging an opentsdb cluster where some region
> directory ended up having 5TB+ files under <regiondir>/.tmp/
> Further debugging and analysis, we were able to reproduce the problem locally
> where we never we recursing in this code path for writing intermediate level
> indices:
> {code:title=HFileBlockIndex.java}
> if (curInlineChunk != null) {
> while (rootChunk.getRootSize() > maxChunkSize) {
> rootChunk = writeIntermediateLevel(out, rootChunk);
> numLevels += 1;
> }
> }
> {code}
> The problem happens if we end up with a very large rowKey (larger than
> "hfile.index.block.max.size" being the first key in the block, then moving
> all the way to the root-level index building. We will keep writing and
> building the next level of intermediate level indices with a single
> very-large key. This can happen in flush / compaction / region recovery
> causing cluster inoperability due to ever-growing files.
> Seems the issue was also reported earlier, with a temporary workaround:
> https://github.com/OpenTSDB/opentsdb/issues/490
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
