[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16225:
------------------------------
    Attachment: HBASE-16225-branch-1-v1.patch

Retry.

> Refactor ScanQueryMatcher
> -------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-16225
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Duo Zhang
>            Assignee: Duo Zhang
>         Attachments: HBASE-16225-branch-1-v1.patch, 
> HBASE-16225-branch-1.patch, HBASE-16225-v1.patch, HBASE-16225-v2.patch, 
> HBASE-16225-v3.patch, HBASE-16225-v4.patch, HBASE-16225-v5.patch, 
> HBASE-16225-v6.patch, HBASE-16225.patch
>
>
> As said in HBASE-16223, the code of {{ScanQueryMatcher}} is too complicated. 
> I suggest that we can abstract an interface and implement several sub classes 
> which separate different logic into different implementations. For example, 
> the requirements of compaction and user scan are different, now we also need 
> to consider the logic of user scan even if we only want to add a logic for 
> compaction. And at least, the raw scan does not need a query matcher... we 
> can implement a dummy query matcher for it.
> Suggestions are welcomed. Thanks.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to