[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15413938#comment-15413938
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-9899:
-------------------------------
ABORTED: Integrated in HBase-Trunk_matrix #1385 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-Trunk_matrix/1385/])
HBASE-9899 for idempotent operation dups, return the result instead of (stack:
rev 46defe8e31278f91b5b92c24744b1839da564f27)
*
hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/RSRpcServices.java
> for idempotent operation dups, return the result instead of throwing conflict
> exception
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-9899
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9899
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Sergey Shelukhin
> Assignee: Guanghao Zhang
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.4.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-9899-addendum.patch, HBASE-9899-branch-1.patch,
> HBASE-9899-branch-1.patch, HBASE-9899-branch-1.patch, HBASE-9899-v1.patch,
> HBASE-9899-v2.patch, HBASE-9899-v3.patch, HBASE-9899-v3.patch,
> HBASE-9899-v4.patch, HBASE-9899-v4.patch
>
>
> After HBASE-3787, we could store mvcc in operation context, and use it to
> convert the modification request into read on dups instead of throwing
> OperationConflictException.
> MVCC tracking will have to be aware of such MVCC numbers present. Given that
> scanners are usually relatively short-lived, that would prevent low watermark
> from advancing for quite a bit more time
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
