[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15415336#comment-15415336
 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-16308:
-------------------------------

In last patch, undid the addition of retries in Admin. The code says they are 
needed in comment but opens new can of worms. The server needs review changing 
IOEs to DoNotRetryIOEs else things like bad column family gets stuck retrying 
when should fail.

> Contain protobuf references
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-16308
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Protobufs
>            Reporter: stack
>            Assignee: stack
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-16308.master.001.patch, 
> HBASE-16308.master.002.patch, HBASE-16308.master.003.patch, 
> HBASE-16308.master.004.patch, HBASE-16308.master.005.patch, 
> HBASE-16308.master.006.patch, HBASE-16308.master.006.patch, 
> HBASE-16308.master.007.patch, HBASE-16308.master.008.patch, 
> HBASE-16308.master.009.patch, HBASE-16308.master.010.patch, 
> HBASE-16308.master.011.patch, HBASE-16308.master.012.patch, 
> HBASE-16308.master.013.patch, HBASE-16308.master.014.patch
>
>
> Clean up our protobuf references so contained to just a few classes rather 
> than being spread about the codebase. Doing this work will make it easier 
> landing the parent issue and will make it more clear where the division 
> between shaded protobuf and unshaded protobuf lies (we need to continue with 
> unshaded protobuf for HDFS references by AsyncWAL and probably EndPoint 
> Coprocessors)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to