[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Anoop Sam John updated HBASE-16440:
-----------------------------------
    Attachment: HBASE-16440_V2.patch

Addressed comments from Stack.
Added a test. With out the patch it some times fails as we will keep more than 
the maxCount #chunks in the pool!

Thanks for the review stack.

> MemstoreChunkPool might cross its maxCount of chunks to pool
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-16440
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16440
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Anoop Sam John
>            Assignee: Anoop Sam John
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-16440.patch, HBASE-16440_V2.patch
>
>
> {code}
> void putbackChunks(BlockingQueue<Chunk> chunks) {
>     int maxNumToPutback = this.maxCount - reclaimedChunks.size();
>     if (maxNumToPutback <= 0) {
>       return;
>     }
>     chunks.drainTo(reclaimedChunks, maxNumToPutback);
>     // clear reference of any non-reclaimable chunks
>     if (chunks.size() > 0) {
>       if (LOG.isTraceEnabled()) {
>         LOG.trace("Left " + chunks.size() + " unreclaimable chunks, removing 
> them from queue");
>       }
>       chunks.clear();
>     }
>   }
> {code}
> There is no synchroization. 2 threads might be calling this API as part of a 
> MSLAB close. (Once the memstore is flushed). It pass all the chunks used by 
> it.  (Those might  not have been come from pool also).  We try to put back 
> chunks such that it is not crossing maxCount.   Suppose maxCount is 10 and 
> currently no chunks in 'reclaimedChunks'. Say both threads at line one. Both 
> see 'maxNumToPutback ' as 10 and that will make 20 chunks being pooled.  
> Similar issue is in putbackChunk(Chunk chunk) API also.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to