[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15426127#comment-15426127
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-16213:
------------------------------------------------
I verfied the updated patch and the comments seems to be fixed. I have not
checked the logic of how the bytebuffers are traversed back and forth and I
believe the test cases would have caught them.
May be there are lot of garbage getting generated because of lot of slices and
duplicates. I think that can be seen later if really it is a problem. As of now
am fine with this patch. +1.
> A new HFileBlock structure for fast random get
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-16213
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16213
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Performance
> Reporter: binlijin
> Assignee: binlijin
> Attachments: HBASE-16213-master_v1.patch, HBASE-16213.patch,
> HBASE-16213_branch1_v3.patch, HBASE-16213_v2.patch, hfile-cpu.png,
> hfile_block_performance.pptx, hfile_block_performance2.pptx,
> new-hfile-block.xlsx
>
>
> HFileBlock store cells sequential, current when to get a row from the block,
> it scan from the first cell until the row's cell.
> The new structure store every row's start offset with data, so it can find
> the exact row with binarySearch.
> I use EncodedSeekPerformanceTest test the performance.
> First use ycsb write 100w data, every row have only one qualifier, and
> valueLength=16B/64/256B/1k.
> Then use EncodedSeekPerformanceTest to test random read 1w or 100w row, and
> also record HFileBlock's dataSize/dataWithMetaSize in the encoding.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
