[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15430086#comment-15430086
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-15871:
-----------------------------------
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 15s
{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s {color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test
files. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 8m
18s {color} | {color:green} branch-1.1 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 29s
{color} | {color:green} branch-1.1 passed with JDK v1.8.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 33s
{color} | {color:green} branch-1.1 passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
33s {color} | {color:green} branch-1.1 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m
22s {color} | {color:green} branch-1.1 passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} findbugs {color} | {color:red} 1m 43s
{color} | {color:red} hbase-server in branch-1.1 has 80 extant Findbugs
warnings. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javadoc {color} | {color:red} 0m 31s
{color} | {color:red} hbase-server in branch-1.1 failed with JDK v1.8.0_101.
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 30s
{color} | {color:green} branch-1.1 passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
39s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 30s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 30s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 33s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 33s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
21s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m
16s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} whitespace {color} | {color:red} 0m 0s
{color} | {color:red} The patch has 14 line(s) that end in whitespace. Use git
apply --whitespace=fix. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} hadoopcheck {color} | {color:red} 7m 36s
{color} | {color:red} The patch causes 11 errors with Hadoop v2.6.1. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} hadoopcheck {color} | {color:red} 8m 48s
{color} | {color:red} The patch causes 11 errors with Hadoop v2.6.2. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} hadoopcheck {color} | {color:red} 9m 59s
{color} | {color:red} The patch causes 11 errors with Hadoop v2.6.3. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} hadoopcheck {color} | {color:red} 11m 10s
{color} | {color:red} The patch causes 11 errors with Hadoop v2.7.1. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hbaseprotoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
14s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
58s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javadoc {color} | {color:red} 0m 23s
{color} | {color:red} hbase-server in the patch failed with JDK v1.8.0_101.
{color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javadoc {color} | {color:red} 0m 29s
{color} | {color:red} hbase-server-jdk1.7.0_101 with JDK v1.7.0_101 generated 1
new + 16 unchanged - 0 fixed = 17 total (was 16) {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 84m 36s {color}
| {color:red} hbase-server in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
29s {color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 115m 22s {color}
| {color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TestHFileOutputFormat |
| | hadoop.hbase.master.TestDistributedLogSplitting |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=1.11.2 Server=1.11.2 Image:yetus/hbase:date2016-08-22 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12809427/HBASE-15871.branch-1.1.003.patch
|
| JIRA Issue | HBASE-15871 |
| Optional Tests | asflicense javac javadoc unit findbugs hadoopcheck
hbaseanti checkstyle compile |
| uname | Linux 4e65f2702476 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed
Sep 3 21:56:12 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/hbase.sh |
| git revision | branch-1.1 / 1c92f4c |
| Default Java | 1.7.0_101 |
| Multi-JDK versions | /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-oracle:1.8.0_101
/usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64:1.7.0_101 |
| findbugs | v3.0.0 |
| findbugs |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3182/artifact/patchprocess/branch-findbugs-hbase-server-warnings.html
|
| javadoc |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3182/artifact/patchprocess/branch-javadoc-hbase-server-jdk1.8.0_101.txt
|
| whitespace |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3182/artifact/patchprocess/whitespace-eol.txt
|
| javadoc |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3182/artifact/patchprocess/patch-javadoc-hbase-server-jdk1.8.0_101.txt
|
| javadoc |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3182/artifact/patchprocess/diff-javadoc-javadoc-hbase-server-jdk1.7.0_101.txt
|
| unit |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3182/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hbase-server.txt
|
| unit test logs |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3182/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hbase-server.txt
|
| Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3182/testReport/ |
| modules | C: hbase-server U: hbase-server |
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3182/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.3.0 http://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
> Memstore flush doesn't finish because of backwardseek() in memstore scanner.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-15871
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15871
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Scanners
> Affects Versions: 1.1.2
> Reporter: Jeongdae Kim
> Fix For: 1.1.2
>
> Attachments: HBASE-15871.branch-1.1.001.patch,
> HBASE-15871.branch-1.1.002.patch, HBASE-15871.branch-1.1.003.patch,
> memstore_backwardSeek().PNG
>
>
> Sometimes in our production hbase cluster, it takes a long time to finish
> memstore flush.( for about more than 30 minutes)
> the reason is that a memstore flusher thread calls
> StoreScanner.updateReaders(), waits for acquiring a lock that store scanner
> holds in StoreScanner.next() and backwardseek() in memstore scanner runs for
> a long time.
> I think that this condition could occur in reverse scan by the following
> process.
> 1) create a reversed store scanner by requesting a reverse scan.
> 2) flush a memstore in the same HStore.
> 3) puts a lot of cells in memstore and memstore is almost full.
> 4) call the reverse scanner.next() and re-create all scanners in this store
> because all scanners was already closed by 2)'s flush() and backwardseek()
> with store's lastTop for all new scanners.
> 5) in this status, memstore is almost full by 2) and all cells in memstore
> have sequenceID greater than this scanner's readPoint because of 2)'s
> flush(). this condition causes searching all cells in memstore, and
> seekToPreviousRow() repeatly seach cells that are already searched if a row
> has one column. (described this in more detail in a attached file.)
> 6) flush a memstore again in the same HStore, and wait until 4-5) process
> finished, to update store files in the same HStore after flusing.
> I searched HBase jira. and found a similar issue. (HBASE-14497) but,
> HBASE-14497's fix can't solve this issue because that fix just changed
> recursive call to loop.(and already applied to our HBase version)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
