[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15445178#comment-15445178
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-16512:
-----------------------------------

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 21s 
{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please 
list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 6m 
32s {color} | {color:green} 0.98 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 13s 
{color} | {color:green} 0.98 passed with JDK v1.8.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 15s 
{color} | {color:green} 0.98 passed with JDK v1.7.0_111 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m 
45s {color} | {color:green} 0.98 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
22s {color} | {color:green} 0.98 passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} findbugs {color} | {color:red} 0m 54s 
{color} | {color:red} hbase-client in 0.98 has 16 extant Findbugs warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javadoc {color} | {color:red} 0m 16s 
{color} | {color:red} hbase-client in 0.98 failed with JDK v1.8.0_101. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 17s 
{color} | {color:green} 0.98 passed with JDK v1.7.0_111 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m 
16s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 13s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 13s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 15s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_111 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 15s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m 
35s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
10s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m 
0s {color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} hadoopcheck {color} | {color:red} 7m 3s 
{color} | {color:red} The patch causes 11 errors with Hadoop v2.6.1. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} hadoopcheck {color} | {color:red} 8m 4s 
{color} | {color:red} The patch causes 11 errors with Hadoop v2.6.2. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} hadoopcheck {color} | {color:red} 9m 5s 
{color} | {color:red} The patch causes 11 errors with Hadoop v2.6.3. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} hadoopcheck {color} | {color:red} 10m 7s 
{color} | {color:red} The patch causes 11 errors with Hadoop v2.7.1. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hbaseprotoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 
10s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m 6s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javadoc {color} | {color:red} 0m 14s 
{color} | {color:red} hbase-client in the patch failed with JDK v1.8.0_101. 
{color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 17s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_111 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 1m 13s 
{color} | {color:green} hbase-client in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m 
10s {color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 25m 7s {color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=1.11.2 Server=1.11.2 Image:yetus/hbase:date2016-08-29 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12825963/HBASE-16512.0.98.patch
 |
| JIRA Issue | HBASE-16512 |
| Optional Tests |  asflicense  javac  javadoc  unit  findbugs  hadoopcheck  
hbaseanti  checkstyle  compile  |
| uname | Linux 0ce465af9beb 3.13.0-92-generic #139-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jun 28 
20:42:26 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/hbase.sh |
| git revision | 0.98 / 99a82be |
| Default Java | 1.7.0_111 |
| Multi-JDK versions |  /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-oracle:1.8.0_101 
/usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64:1.7.0_111 |
| findbugs | v2.0.1 |
| findbugs | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3307/artifact/patchprocess/branch-findbugs-hbase-client-warnings.html
 |
| javadoc | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3307/artifact/patchprocess/branch-javadoc-hbase-client-jdk1.8.0_101.txt
 |
| javadoc | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3307/artifact/patchprocess/patch-javadoc-hbase-client-jdk1.8.0_101.txt
 |
|  Test Results | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3307/testReport/ |
| modules | C: hbase-client U: hbase-client |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3307/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.3.0   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> when locate meta region, we should respect the param "useCache" passed in on 
> 0.98
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-16512
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16512
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.98.21
>            Reporter: Heng Chen
>             Fix For: 0.98.22
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-16512.0.98.patch, HBASE-16512_0.98.patch
>
>
> we found that when RS with meta crash,  client will retry the same request,  
> but it still use the original meta location in cache, so all request retried 
> will failed. 
> Notice the code in HConnectionMananger#locateRegionInMeta,  the "useCache" 
> passed in is not used when try to found the meta region. 
> {code}
>     private HRegionLocation locateRegionInMeta(final TableName parentTable,
>       final TableName tableName, final byte [] row, boolean useCache,
>       Object regionLockObject, boolean retry)
>     throws IOException {
>       ......
>       for (int tries = 0; true; tries++) {
>        .....
>         HRegionLocation metaLocation = null;
>         try {
>           // locate the meta region
>           metaLocation = locateRegion(parentTable, metaKey, true, false); 
> //NOTICE: we should honor the "useCache" passed in when locate the meta 
> region.
>           ....
>       }
>     }
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to