[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15448226#comment-15448226
]
Stephen Yuan Jiang commented on HBASE-16519:
--------------------------------------------
Do we really need latch in 2.0 branch? Those async procedure are new in 2.0
> Procedure v2 - Avoid sync wait on DDLs operation
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-16519
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16519
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: master, proc-v2
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: Matteo Bertozzi
> Assignee: Matteo Bertozzi
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-16519-v0.patch
>
>
> Some operation ModifyColumnFamily, AddDeleteColumnFamily, DeleteColumnFamily,
> ModifyTable, TruncateTable are still synchronous on the master side. with a
> wait until the operation completes before returning.
> this was done to keep the sync behavior for old client. but instead of using
> the procLatch which recognize the client version and decide if the operation
> should be sync or not it just always wait. making the client side proc fault
> tolerance ineffective.
> also the add/delete/modifyColumnFamily operation does not seems to follow the
> Async() naming in master. and the comment claim to be async but everyone uses
> them as sync. (this is something from HBASE-13538)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
